POST A COMMENT

8 Comments

Back to Article

  • Dante Verizon - Friday, May 3, 2024 - link

    Now it's getting interesting. Reply
  • Threska - Friday, May 3, 2024 - link

    Now their phones can compete. Reply
  • ballsystemlord - Saturday, May 4, 2024 - link

    Now they have more than 1% yield. ;) Reply
  • Dante Verizon - Saturday, May 4, 2024 - link

    *In-house Socs, not phones.

    It will help a lot to make Exynos more competitive against Snapdragon.
    Reply
  • Terry_Craig - Saturday, May 4, 2024 - link

    Indeed, Exynos faces hurdles due to Samsung's inferior process. It would be fascinating to observe the practical implications if the rumors regarding AMD manufacturing certain low-end products at Samsung turned out to be true. Reply
  • nandnandnand - Wednesday, May 8, 2024 - link

    I want AMD to succeed at using Samsung 4nm, because it opens up the possibility of true budget chips in higher volumes, keeping prices down. Get a budget APU to Intel N100 pricing.

    The certain product rumored is Sonoma Valley, a platform compatible Mendocino sequel. 4x Zen 5C cores, which would be stellar, faster than a 5500U and supporting AVX-512, likely slower graphics. But it would crush top Mendocino (7520U).
    Reply
  • SydneyBlue120d - Saturday, May 4, 2024 - link

    The next generation Snapdragon is officially confirmed to be made in 3nm... Reply
  • Kangal - Sunday, May 5, 2024 - link

    Sounds like Samsung is getting back into the fight, it's just too bad they've lost a lot of their potential.

    I actually liked their ambition, and pushing for their custom architecture. They should have kept their in-house department and continue developing Mongoose. They lack in the GPU/NPU side, so it would've been great if Samsung was the one to acquire Imagination Technologies. Their fabrications were pretty competitive too until 2018. And now we're seeing a whole system being built. Not to mention they also manufacture the memory, storage, camera, display, and the housing modules.

    In fact, I would've loved to see Samsung stay away from Windows Phone and Android, and instead to partner with Nokia to build a Linux-Ecosystem for phones, tablets, laptops, desktops, TV Consoles. I had their first BadaOS and it was quite revolutionary at the time.

    You know, to have an extra horse in the race:
    (iOS) Apple + Motorola
    ("Curios") Samsung + Nokia
    ("Windows Mobile") Microsoft + Blackberry + HTC
    ("Android") Google + LG + Sony + Siemens
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now